Showing posts with label curfew laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label curfew laws. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The Wanaque...milkshake party?


Look up the etymology of "curfew" and you will find that it originates with the 14th century French word "cuevrefeu," which means, quite literally, "cover fire." It was brought into being as a way to describe the practice of ringing a bell at a certain hour each night to remind citizens to bank the flames in their hearths so as to prevent the outbreak of fires.

I wonder what would have happened, however, if the bells had incited more blazes than they'd stopped? Anyone from the Borough of Wanaque, which is being sued because of its own "cuevrefeu," might not venture to answer.

You see, in 2005, the Wanaque Borough Council approved an ordinance that declared (with very few exceptions) that no one under the age of 18 is allowed out on the street between the hours of 10 p.m. – 5:30 a.m. According to the wording in the ordinance, council people felt that this would reduce the likelihood of youths becoming either involved in or victims of criminal acts — a cunning move, no doubt, to combat the allure of the mean streets of Wanaque.

Evidently this had not been challenged until last week when the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ) brought a suit against the borough after one its police officers stopped and ticketed a 17-year-old girl named Shaina Harris for violating the law.

According to the ACLU's website, the community college student had gone to buy a milkshake at the Burger King across the street (with her parent's permission), and was on her way back when she was stopped near the family mailbox by the cop. He asked her why she was out without adult supervision, she called her stepfather out of the house, and the affair ended with a $100 citation (with the possibility of up to 15 hours of community service as well.)

Wow, really America? Is that what this once-great, brawling backwoods country has been reduced to in the year 2013 — giving tickets to kids who buy milkshakes at too late an hour?

Don't misunderstand me; I know that minors don't always make the best decisions, and the legal precedent allows them to be held to slightly different standards than the rest of us. And even a freedom-demanding person like me can understand the rational for the occasional curfew, especially when there's the potential for immediate civil strife in the wake of rioting or natural disasters.

But to have the government dictate that one segment off the population be off the street at a certain time only because of their age? I must wonder what our Founding Fathers, those patriarchs that so many invoke at the outset of every argument, would say if they heard that one.

Make no mistake, this country was created because of the intense, violent reaction to two things: taxation without representation, and an overbearing and demanding government. 

Our American brethren have fought and died on foreign ground in defense of those ideals, and many were the same age as or a few months older than Harris when they did; at 17, my own grandfather was fighting in the Pacific Theater of World War II.

I am not sure how the Wanaque Council, which so ignorantly passed this measure eight years ago, did so while standing in the same room as an American flag, and I'm not sure what God-given right they thought they had to suppose that they could limit, in any way, the times that any American citizen, minor or not, could travel in the public space. They may have checked if it was legal — but did they think on whether it was just?

Simply put, it's up to parents to decide what time their kids can be out until, not some legislative body that has brushed with too broad a stroke.

If this is the course we're on, though, we should make it easier for police to discern who is under 18 and who is not. Maybe we could have the kids wear a patch over their heart, something with a backwards flag or a milkshake with a red "X" over it.

Maybe the municipality could give out fake tattoos to be pasted on the youth's forearms as a constant reminder that they are not quite free yet, no matter what the songs they sang in elementary school said. Yea, that one might work. Then, at 18, a government representative could come and remove it, and mark down the exact date that you were granted freedom.

One thing I can tell you — if I was about 17 right now, every night at 10:01 p.m., I'd be standing on the street, my feet just past the curb, with an American flag in my arms.

Every. Single. Night.

Hey, think of it this way kids: you'll only have to do it for year or so. Once you turn 18, you can trade your fist full of tickets for your selective service card, which you can be sure will arrive very promptly.

Congratulations. Welcome to America!

Email: janoski@northjersey.com

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Curtain call for the spirit of the Glorious Fourth

BY STEVE JANOSKI
Wednesday, July 13

It was a bit ironic that I read the story on the Fourth of July, as the crackle and boom of fireworks thundered through the night and citizens of the republic celebrated not only the birth of America, but of democracy itself.

Entitled "Saddle Brook joins other North Jersey towns by approving a teen curfew," it was written by Suburban Trends sister paper The Record, and chronicled the difficulty that township seems to be having with its youth gone wild.

The story said that residents packed a recent Township Council meeting, spreading abhorrent stories about teens drinking after dark, vandalizing property and — if you can believe this, being disrespectful while riding mopeds (have they no shame?)

The council responded to these shocking allegations of human indecency by quickly forgetting what country it lives in, and voted 3-1 to institute a teen curfew limit of 10 p.m. for all youths under age 17, set to go into effect on July 25.

Council members pointed out that neighboring towns like Lodi and Garfield have them, and because Saddle Brook doesn’t, it becomes a "hang out zone."

As a consequence, according to the story, unaccompanied teens found breaking the curfew will be "subject to a fine of $100 to $500, and two to eight hours of community service per offense."

While I am sure that these roving gangs of disrespectful moped riders are truly wreaking havoc on the lovely Saddle Brook neighborhoods, is that reason enough to paint all teenagers with one broad brush?

Forget the girl who works at a restaurant and doesn’t finish up until after 10 p.m. — no more walking home for her.

Forget the kid whose old man is a violent drunk, and his only respite was going for a walk in an attempt to hide from his own bleak reality; no, the two-stroke highwaymen have ruined that.

And, on a grander scale, how dare a governing body in the United States of America even consider banning any of its citizens from the streets?

While curfews are not a new thing, typically they are instituted in either times of extraordinary civil unrest, or to blatantly discriminate against a specific group, such as Japanese-Americans students during World War II or Jim Crow-era blacks in the South.

The resurgence of these laws directed against teenagers is punishing all the kids for the sins of a few, and the idea that any parent, or any American for that matter, is OK with the idea of a policemen stopping a person, even a minor, and telling them that the law says you can’t be out right now, is appalling.

If there is a crime issue, and residents are really frightened of the youth who hang out in the township’s darkened corners, then it must be addressed in the way that all problems should be addressed: through education, more parental involvement, and more sports.

These are things that will turn the teenagers away from the shadows, not some stopgap law that casts a much too wide a net in order to catch a couple sharks.

This law must be fought without hesitation and with ceaseless, brutal intensity, and the citizens of Saddle Brook should remind their council that telling any American citizen, regardless of age or color or creed, that they have a curfew, is taking a sledgehammer to the freedoms that were built with bricks molded from the ideas of the greatest minds of history and sealed with the blood of every American patriot.

Even more frightening is the idea that those raised with a government installed curfew will come to believe that such a thing is neither evil nor immoral — and they are the ones who will make the laws in the future.

I urge you people of Saddle Brook to take to the next council meeting, and tell these politicians that they have no right to legislate a curfew for any American except in a time of extraordinary civil strife, and that this blatant attempt to snuff out the freedoms of the youngest of this country’s citizens will not be tolerated.

E-mail: janoski@northjersey.com



http://www.northjersey.com/news/125543128_Curtain_call_for_the_spirit_of_the_Glorious_Fourth.html